should "__LITTLE_ENDIAN__" be "__LITTLE_ENDIAN" in endianness.h?
Reported by chris | January 9th, 2013 @ 01:25 AM | in 1.2.0 Release
in the code: (line 13 to line 21)
#ifndef __BYTE_ORDER
#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__
#define __BYTE_ORDER __LITTLE_ENDIAN
#else
#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
#define __BYTE_ORDER __BIG_ENDIAN
#endif
#endif
#endif
LITTLE_ENDIAN should be LITTLE_ENDIAN? and BIG_ENDIAN__?
I think this may be the reason for #308
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
Martin S. February 12th, 2013 @ 02:12 PM
- State changed from new to open
- Tag set to endianess
- Assigned user set to Nikias Bassen
-
Martin S. March 19th, 2013 @ 05:36 PM
- State changed from open to resolved
- Milestone set to 1.2.0 Release
A stupid typo prevented configure.ac from properly advancing to the manual byte order detection code.
This should be fixed in git master.
Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.
With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile ยป
A project around supporting the iPhone in Linux.
See http://libimobiledevice.org
People watching this ticket
Tags
Referenced by
- 308 afc_receive_data() failed with "ERROR: usbmuxd_recv returned -11" on windows (MinGW) BTW, do you see this ticket #309 ? I found that "__LITTLE...
- 308 afc_receive_data() failed with "ERROR: usbmuxd_recv returned -11" on windows (MinGW) Yes, I have seen #309, however the endianess is set by co...